Excuse me, but exactly what, might I ask, is THAT?
Michael Kors, what are you trying to say by showing these shoes with your collection? Are you trying to say something obsurd like, "sometimes, I pair ugly, unflattering shoes with my collection, not because they actually look good, but because they enhance the overall 'campy' vibe of my collection."? Because I hate that. I really hate when designers put unflattering pieces in their collection for art's sake. It's called "Ready to Wear" for a reason. Am I supposed to be ready to wear those shoes? Because that will literally never happen. I hoped this was an error, but the fashion gods at Camp Kors would never let something like this slip. Therefore this must be intentional. A disgusting and purposefully made, mistake.
More goodies I found as I scanned the collection:
Look! Does this look familiar to anyone else? WATER WORLD chic. (aka: one of the lamest movies ever, set in a post-apocolyptic, water-covered Earth)
Like WTF, Michael Kors. WTF is this? I am so confused. I need to understand how you paired the above "fashions" with these amazing pieces, all in the same collection:
How was this all part of the same show? I get the whole safari, traveller thing. But come on, Kors! How is it that you can judge these poor, idiotic, wannabe designers every week on Project Runway and then sit here with your dumpy man shoes and Waterworld costumes and claim to have a cohesive and fashion forward Spring collection?
You've never been on my shit list before, MK, but you're fucking on it now! You've been warned, people. If disgusting, leather, fugly, man shoes make headlines next spring...we all know who to blame. I also blame Michael Kors for my lack of sleep.
No comments:
Post a Comment